THOSE ARE NOT GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
Alfonso León Guillen Gómez
Independent scientific researcher, Bogotá,
Colombia
E-mail: aguillen@gmx.net
ABSTRACT
The General Relativity defines mathematically;
through of a dynamic geometric differential tensorial model, static
gravitational field like the metric tensor o f a Lorentzian manifold, representing
curvature of geometric four-
dimensional entity named
spacetime, depending of
the four-tensor
energy-impulse. Of other
hand, Einstein conceptually formulated
spacetime as quality
structural of gravitational
field, i.e, a
circular definition between
gravity and spacetime, also Einstein denoted " Space and time are modes by
which we think, not conditions under which we live " and “We denote everything but the gravitational field
as matter”, therefore, spacetime
is nothing and
gravitational field is
not a material
field but in first approximation
an effect of coordinates,
and definitely a
geometric field, i.e,
nothing. The mathematical model
generates quantitative
predictions coincident with observations in high grade of exactitude without
physical meaning.
The philosophy of the science has intervened
General Relativity from two schools: in the Substantivalism, spacetime is
defined existing itself, and storing all events, to order of situation and to
order of succession while in
Relationalism as the metrical
relations of coexistence
and succession between
events. But, "Space-time is still an enigma to
science and philosophy" (Lorente, 2006) because “We really do not know what
spacetime” (Odenwald, 2015).
Of such way,
the outcomes of the
black box, which
is the mathematical model,
inside of the
context of the dominant scientific
positivism, has supported
during a century the
validity of the
General Relativity, that
in absence of
intrinsic physical meaning,
it counterfeits arbitrarily. Due
to his mathematical
dynamic model, Einstein
formulated, from sources
of quadrupole of energy,
the formation of
ripples in that
geometric entity noted
as spacetime which
propagate as gravitational waves,
travelling in the
space, that Einstein abandoned
in 1938 when
he said that gravitational waves really do not exist.
On February 11, 2016, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration announced that they
had first detection,
on September 14,
2015, gravitational waves
from a pair
of merging lack holes.
They say that
are waves of
the fabric of spacetime, therefore,
interpreting them according
to Substantivalism, one conventional
philosophical conception in
dispute with Relationalism. Those
waves detected by LIGO
truly are quadru-polar
transverse mechanical
quantum waves of
quantum vacuum a physical medium; they transport energy but graviton
is not.
KEYWORDS: Relativity, gravitational waves,
quantum vacuum, mechanical quantum waves.
In the dates in that was reported on the experimental verification of the alleged gravitational waves, the author participated in the forums of the following publications, presenting his thesis that they are really waves of quantum vacuum:
-The black-hole collision that reshaped physics: Nature
-Here’s the first person to spot those gravitational waves: Science
-The Gravity Wave Hunter: Nautilus
-About Those Gravitational Waves: Hackaday
The article was accepted for its publication by
Journal of Modern Physics (JMP), 27 May 2016.
The referee said:
“In
this present manuscript,
the authors presented that there
are two recognized
cases in that
the rectifications about
formulations made by great scientists are
not served by the scientific
community that the appropriated. Then the authors stated that
the theory of Einstein had sufficient reason because inside of context of
General Relativity is impossible gravitational waves. However, the mathematical
exercises of Einstein
drive us to detect quadrupole transverse waves of quantum vacuum an extraordinary
find. In my review, this is a very nicely written theoretical and analytical
paper, and the author analyzed and discussed the results in
detail and correctly.
The theoretically developed
analyses in this
paper are correct and the obtained
results are interesting.
This paper includes
a very sufficient
research content. If the
author can revise this paper by
the comments indicated below, I
recommend to accept it for publication.”
Accepted for its publication by Wulfenia 2 June 2016
The editor said:
“The journal editorial board has made final
decision about your submitted paper.
Based on the reviewers' comments, your paper
could be considered for publication in Wulfenia
Journal. At this point,
to include your
paper for publication
in Wulfenia, you
are required to
pay the publication and printing cost of your paper”.
Accepted for its publication by Jokull Journal
The editor said:
We are pleased to inform you that based upon
the reviewers` comments your paper entitled 'Wave detected by LIGO is not
gravitational wave' meets the required qualifications to be included in Jokull coming issue.
In all cases, the author could not pay charges
of publication due to the absence any sponsorship