THOSE ARE NOT GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
Alfonso León Guillen Gómez
Independent scientific researcher, Bogotá, Colombia
The General Relativity defines mathematically; through of a dynamic geometric differential tensorial model, static gravitational field like the metric tensor o f a Lorentzian manifold, representing curvature of geometric four- dimensional entity named spacetime, depending of the four-tensor energy-impulse. Of other hand, Einstein conceptually formulated spacetime as quality structural of gravitational field, i.e, a circular definition between gravity and spacetime, also Einstein denoted " Space and time are modes by which we think, not conditions under which we live " and “We denote everything but the gravitational field as matter”, therefore, spacetime is nothing and gravitational field is not a material field but in first approximation an effect of coordinates, and definitely a geometric field, i.e, nothing. The mathematical model generates quantitative predictions coincident with observations in high grade of exactitude without physical meaning.
The philosophy of the science has intervened General Relativity from two schools: in the Substantivalism, spacetime is defined existing itself, and storing all events, to order of situation and to order of succession while in Relationalism as the metrical relations of coexistence and succession between events. But, "Space-time is still an enigma to science and philosophy" (Lorente, 2006) because “We really do not know what spacetime” (Odenwald, 2015). Of such way, the outcomes of the black box, which is the mathematical model, inside of the context of the dominant scientific positivism, has supported during a century the validity of the General Relativity, that in absence of intrinsic physical meaning, it counterfeits arbitrarily. Due to his mathematical dynamic model, Einstein formulated, from sources of quadrupole of energy, the formation of ripples in that geometric entity noted as spacetime which propagate as gravitational waves, travelling in the space, that Einstein abandoned in 1938 when he said that gravitational waves really do not exist. On February 11, 2016, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration announced that they had first detection, on September 14, 2015, gravitational waves from a pair of merging lack holes. They say that are waves of the fabric of spacetime, therefore, interpreting them according to Substantivalism, one conventional philosophical conception in dispute with Relationalism. Those waves detected by LIGO truly are quadru-polar transverse mechanical quantum waves of quantum vacuum a physical medium; they transport energy but graviton is not.
KEYWORDS: Relativity, gravitational waves, quantum vacuum, mechanical quantum waves.
In the dates in that was reported on the experimental verification of the alleged gravitational waves, the author participated in the forums of the following publications, presenting his thesis that they are really waves of quantum vacuum:
-The black-hole collision that reshaped physics: Nature
-Here’s the first person to spot those gravitational waves: Science
-The Gravity Wave Hunter: Nautilus
-About Those Gravitational Waves: Hackaday
The article was accepted for its publication by Journal of Modern Physics (JMP), 27 May 2016.
The referee said:
“In this present manuscript, the authors presented that there are two recognized cases in that the rectifications about formulations made by great scientists are not served by the scientific community that the appropriated. Then the authors stated that the theory of Einstein had sufficient reason because inside of context of General Relativity is impossible gravitational waves. However, the mathematical exercises of Einstein drive us to detect quadrupole transverse waves of quantum vacuum an extraordinary find. In my review, this is a very nicely written theoretical and analytical paper, and the author analyzed and discussed the results in detail and correctly. The theoretically developed analyses in this paper are correct and the obtained results are interesting. This paper includes a very sufficient research content. If the author can revise this paper by the comments indicated below, I recommend to accept it for publication.”
Accepted for its publication by Wulfenia 2 June 2016
The editor said:
“The journal editorial board has made final decision about your submitted paper.
Based on the reviewers' comments, your paper could be considered for publication in Wulfenia Journal. At this point, to include your paper for publication in Wulfenia, you are required to pay the publication and printing cost of your paper”.
Accepted for its publication by Jokull Journal
The editor said:
We are pleased to inform you that based upon the reviewers` comments your paper entitled 'Wave detected by LIGO is not gravitational wave' meets the required qualifications to be included in Jokull coming issue.
In all cases, the author could not pay charges of publication due to the absence any sponsorship